By MARY WILLIAMS WALSH
The judge rejected arguments that the city’s plan unfairly discriminated among creditors by shielding the city’s retirees from any impairment of their pensions, saying that while it did not directly cut the pensions, it did eliminate the retirees’ health benefits and other compensation.
Published: October 30, 2014 at 12:00AM
from NYT Business Day http://ift.tt/1zO6uXe
from WordPress http://ift.tt/1p7zuES
via Hadi Aboukhater
No comments:
Post a Comment